#CMSC16 – MS Expert Fred Lublin Discusses Relevance of MS Relapses

Patricia Silva, PhD avatar

by Patricia Silva, PhD |

Share this article:

Share article via email

Dr. Fred Lublin,Ā a renowned multiple sclerosis (MS) expert atĀ Mount Sinai Medical Center, helped launch theĀ Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) 2016 Annual Meeting,Ā June 1 – 4, in National Harbor, Md. with the John F. Kurtzke Memorial Lecture he titledĀ ā€œDo Relapses Really Matter?ā€

ā€œHow relapses influence disease worsening, and clinical outcomes in MS over the long-term, continues to be debated and accurate ways to determine what constitutes a relapse in MS and the severity of relapses have been lacking,ā€ Lublin wrote in the CMSC 2016 program booklet.

His opening lecture providedĀ insight about how, with emerging efficacy data, MS care professionals can begin to re-evaluate what is an ā€˜acceptableā€™ relapse rate.

Dr. Lublin began the presentationĀ by defining relapse as the “essence of clinical diagnosis of MS”, and a “distinct event relatively easy to determine onset – not so easy to determine offset.”

There are several types of MS.

Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is the most common form of the disease,Ā occurring in 85% of MS cases. RRMS is characterized by clearly defined phases of relapse and progressive worsening of nerve functions with each attack. Normal conditions can be restored during occasional remission phases. Some people fully recover between attacks, while others only experience partial recovery.

Progressive MS, another type of the disease, is characterized byĀ progressive neurological damage. According to Lublin, “many MS patients begin with a relapsing form and convert to a progressive form.”

Lubin posed several question during his lecture: “Is worsening from a relapse different from gradual progression?”, “What is the role of relapse in subsequent development of disability?”, “How much does it matter?”

“We have the potential to reduce relapse rates to very low levels” he stated.Ā “We need therapies that address progressive disease . . . Ā The earlier disability occurs, the longer one is in a more disabled state: this is a QOL (quality of life) issue.”

Dr. LublinĀ also discussed the term NEDA (no evidence of disease activity), which is defined as an activity free state Ā of the disease in which there are “no relapses, no progression of disability, no gadolinium enhancement, no new or enlarging T2 lesions.”

NEDA is an emerging goalĀ in multiple sclerosis treatment supported by the idea that an effective MS therapy should allow patients to reach NEDA, a point where the patient isĀ free of visible and silent MS disease symptoms and activity.Ā The concept of NEDA, applied to MS, is evolving and based on the fact that single variables such asĀ relapse frequency, may not be a sufficient indicator ofĀ MS activity.

Multiple Sclerosis News TodayĀ previously conducted a telephone interview LublinĀ in which he discussed the importance of relapses in MS and its impact on clinical outcomes. For more information, please visit this link.