Long-term treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) appears to lessen the risk of disease worsening in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients, an 18-year follow-up study suggests.
The study, “Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies,” was published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical.
Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are treatments that aim to reduce MS progression from relapsing–remitting forms of the disease to SPMS.
Researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,709 patients registered at the Group for Research and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (GITEM) Registry in Valencia, Spain.
Out of the initial 1,709 patients, 225 were clinically diagnosed with MS and 204 received treatment with first-line DMTs — interferon beta (Biogen‘s Avonex, among other brand names) or glatiramer acetate (sold as Teva‘s Copaxone).
Treatment with DMTs began when patients experienced at least one relapse in the previous year or two relapses within the previous three years. RRMS patients were followed for a median of 18.1 years.
Patients who failed to respond to treatment were given second-line therapies, namely the immune suppressants Novantrone (mitoxantrone), cyclophosphamide, or selective second-line DMTs, such as Tysabri (natalizumab) or Gilenya (fingolimod).
Study participants were evaluated regularly — every three to six months — for changes in their Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, relapse rates, and for side effects or decisions to stop treatment.
Progression to SPMS was confirmed “when patients with a previous EDSS score of 3.0 or greater experienced a six-month worsening to EDSS 4.0 or greater without evidence of relapse,” the researchers wrote.
Connect with other patients and caregivers, find support and share tips for living well with MS in our MS News Today forums.
An EDSS score of 4 is characterized by significant disability, although patients are still able to walk without aid.
In total, 204 patients were treated with DMTs for a median of 12 years. Of these, 88 (43.1%) switched to second-line therapies because of treatment failure, and 29 switched from interferon beta to glatiramer acetate due to side effects that included “flu-like syndrome” (17 people) and “dermatological events” (11).
A total of 109 patients (53.4%) reached an EDSS of 3.0 within 14.1 years, and 74 (36.3%) progressed to SPMS in eight years (median age 42.6). Forty patients took a mean of about 20 years to reach an EDSS score of 6.0, which notes disability at a level that requires a walking aid.
Predictors of disease progression included multifocal relapse, being older than age 34 at disease onset (older patients had a four times greater risk of progressing to SPMS), and failure to respond to first-line disease-modifying therapy.
These parameters also predicted shorter times to reach EDSS 3.0 or EDSS 6.0 scores.
Fifty-two patients (64.7%) were treated with second-line DMTs after they progressed to SPMS; they reached an EDSS score of 6 within 12 years of the first MS event.
But RRMS patients given first-line DMTs took 21 years to reach an EDSS of 6, and only 9.5% of those who switched to second-line therapies progressed to SPMS.
These results compared to other natural history studies, the researchers said, suggesting that treatment with DMTs might slow disease progression in RRMS patients.
In this study, 36.3% of RRMS patients worsened to SPMS after 18 years of follow-up, compared to 58% and 66.3% of patients whose disease progressed during a similar follow-up in two independent studies.
But in patients whose disease progressed to SPMS, disease-modifying therapies had no effect.
“[W]e consider it likely that long-term treatment with DMTs might reduce the number of patients who will develop SPMS,” the researchers concluded. “However, in patients who do convert to SPMS, time to conversion, age of transition and subsequent cumulative disability are not influenced by current therapies.”
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?