Ocrevus: Should I Switch?

Ocrevus: Should I Switch?


There was much fanfare when the multiple sclerosis drug Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) finally was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last week.

Perhaps a little too much fanfare?

For example, a story broadcast on the NBC Nightly News focused on a woman, apparently a participant in an Ocrevus clinical study, who moved out of her wheelchair and is now walking well enough to want to go dancing. I’m just guessing here, but I’ll bet her response to the drug is not typical.

Just the same, there’s lots of buzz about Ocrevus on the various online MS forums. On one Facebook group I posed the question “Do you plan to switch to Ocrevus from your current DMD?” and I found the decision process combines several elements: Will the drug help me? Will the drug harm me? How much will it cost me, even if my medical plan approves my coverage. What does my neurologist think?

Online opinions are mixed

“I have been high JC + since diagnosis in fall of last year. Started Tysabri in November and MS neurologist wanted to use it until ocrelizumab was approved. I see him Thursday this week to discuss my concerns about it and have my possible last ty infusion…I haven’t decided on new drug yet…He is excited about it tho”

“My question is what are the long term effects of suppressing your B cells”

“I am planning on it. My dr wanted me on it in December before it got delayed”

“I’ve only started reading about it, but given the side effects sound like those of Avonex, and my life was absolute hell on that, I’m not chomping at the bit to switch. Plus, it’s an infusion. I’m not into needles, to put it mildly. It would have to prove to be wildly successful at reducing relapses (beyond the study) or I’d have to have no other options for me to decide to switch right now.”

“I personally don’t take newly released meds (of any kind) anymore. I used to jump on them as soon as they came out but most times the risks outweighed the benefits (for me). I will consider it maybe a year down the road”

“I don’t want to be the rare one they discover a problem with. I’d rather wait a while”

Some neurologists have concerns

Though most MS specialists who have been interviewed are very positive about Ocrevus, others have qualms. A lengthy article on the website Health News Review quotes Annette M. Langer-Gould, MD, PhD, as calling the drug “a fake break-through.” Langer-Gould is a neurologist and resesarcher who once worked for the drug’s manufacturer, Genentech. She has a number of concerns. One is the risk of tumors in Ocrevus patients. Another is her belief that another drug made by Genentech, Rituxan (rituximab), provides the same medical benefits at a lower cost and with fewer serious side effects.

Though Rituxan is FDA-approved for other illnesses it never has been approved for use by MS patients.  Genentech never applied for that approval and Langer-Gould suspects that’s because Ocrevus would bring the drug company greater profits. The doctor’s MS clinic is prescribing Rituxan, off-label, for its patients and she says it doesn’t plan to switch patients to Ocrevus.

The same is true at the International Multiple Sclerosis Management Practice in New York. It issued a statement saying, in part, “Although, it is indeed progress that the first medication for PPMS has been approved, the patients should be fully informed of its potential risks. For patients who can obtain Rituximab, it would be safer to continue with this therapy, until with time, we are better able to advise patients about the risks associated with Ocrelizumab.”

To switch, or not to switch

So, should I switch from my current disease-modifying therapy? No, I think not.

Some of the questions and concerns that patients and physicians have raised about Ocrevus are addressed by Genentech’s chief medical officer, Peter Chin, MD, in a recent MS News Today interview. And the drug might be best for some. But my current DMD, Lemtrada, is two years post-clinical trials and has a track record. It has side effects, and has had ups and downs for me, but I believe the problems can be managed. There’s a very good chance that my drug will halt any further progression of my MS. The drug costs will be covered by my medical plans, at least for now. And, best of all, there’s a chance that my current DMD may reverse some of my MS symptoms.

Only time will tell if this, or any of my MS treatment decisions, is the right one. But for now I think I’ll stick with the horse I rode in on.


Note: Multiple Sclerosis News Today is strictly a news and information website about the disease. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. This content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. The opinions expressed in this column are not those of Multiple Sclerosis News Today, or its parent company, BioNews Services, and are intended to spark discussion about issues pertaining to multiple sclerosis.

Ed Tobias is a retired broadcast journalist. Most of his 40+ year career was spent as a manager with the Associated Press in Washington, DC. Tobias was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 1980 but he continued to work, full-time, meeting interesting people and traveling to interesting places, until retiring at the end of 2012.
Ed Tobias is a retired broadcast journalist. Most of his 40+ year career was spent as a manager with the Associated Press in Washington, DC. Tobias was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 1980 but he continued to work, full-time, meeting interesting people and traveling to interesting places, until retiring at the end of 2012.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?


    • Tammy says:

      Ok so I have been in rebif, didn’t work then trysbri worked great taken off of it because Jc positive and my PML levels went from 1 in 200,000 to 6 years later 1 in 100. Taken off to be put on gylina, 2 years later got sick went on tecfedica then 1 month later back to gylina now I have a active 8mm lesion wanting to put me on OCREVUS or Lemtrada which did I do.. nothing seems to work.. 😏

      • Ed Tobias says:

        I just passed the 9-month mark following my first round of Lemtrada infusions and I’m doing well. I’ve just written about this in my column that’s scheduled to be published Friday, Sept. 15. Keep an eye out for it.


  1. Jared says:

    I just got my first Ocrevus treatment (half dose 300mg) yesterday and so far so good! I had a wicked headache and felt flu like symptoms after it but taking Tylenol and sleeping it off worked wonders. I feel great today! Really hopeful this will continue to get better. I would def recommend looking into Ocrevus at least.

  2. Callie says:

    Well Ed Tobias, I don’t think you need to be going into closed groups to write your papers. That’s totally against all rules and regulations. And I’m sure you won’t post this comment but you can’t just use what people say in closed groups. It’s not ethical nor right. People are to feel safe in these groups and do not need reporters harassing them.

    • Ed Tobias says:

      Dear Callie,

      I did not go into a closed group to obtain the quotes that I used in this column, nor would I.

      The writer/administrator of the Ocrevus group has made a false assumption. Although I was a member of that group (until the administrator removed me without first contacting me to ask where I obtained the quotes in this column) her group was NOT the source of those quotes. Nor was the Ocreus group ever mentioned in my column.

      In researching this column I asked for comments about Ocrevus from members of the “We’re Not Drunk, We Have MS” Facebook group and the comments that I used were all used with the knowledge of the people who made them. Here is my original request that was made on that group:

      “Now that Ocrevus has been approved how many of you are thinking about, or planning to, switch to it from your current DMD? For a column that I’m writing I’d like to know your thoughts. What prompted your decision? Are you asking your neuro about it? Did your neuro suggested it to you? Which DMD are you switching from? Etc. My column is called The MS Wire and it’s published on the http://www.multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com web site. You can respond to the group or feel free to DM me. (This is not an ad. The post has been approved by Leslie). Thanks.”

      The quotes in the column were in response to that request, which was made with the knowledge of that group’s administrator (Leslie).

      I’ve not received a response from any Ocrevus group administrator to this explanation. At the least, I believe I’m due an apology.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *